In March Coop were granted planning permission for a new convenience store on the Loose Road opposite Tesco Express where a car showroom had previously been.
Maidstone Borough Council imposed planning conditions and one of these was that at least 'one publicly accessible electric vehicle charging point' should be provided. This has become a common condition for even small developments to help improve Maidstone's sustainable transport and air quality.
Now Coop want this condition removed and their motive seems to be that they want an extra space for cars with polluting combustion engines. They attempt to justify it by saying that because it's a convenience store the average visit time will be less than 10 minutes which won't be enough to charge a car. Ionity are installing chargers that will take as little as 8 minutes.
Please object to this application and hopefully we can stop these Luddites in their tracks!
You can read the applicants letter here, full details here and my objection here.
To object you can either by registering with the planning portal site or emailing planningcomments@midkent.gov.uk and quote reference 19/500388/FULL.
A blog for some of my thoughts on local, national & international issues. I am expressing my views in personal capacity & my views don't necessarily represent the position of any organisation that I am part of.
Wednesday, 17 July 2019
Friday, 24 May 2019
For KCC to target 2050 to cut emissions to net zero is at best like flipping a coin for our future
Yesterday Conservative Kent Country Councillors undermined a motion which made a genuine effort to help tackle global warming when they trebled the
length of time in which action is to be taken.
In a
debate on a motion brought to the council by KCC's sole Green
councillor, which was supported by Lib Dems and Labour, a disagreement
centred on the dates 2030 or 2050. UN scientists reported last year that
there was a 50:50 chance of avoiding global warming of over 1.5 degrees
if global emissions are reduced to net zero by 2050. (1.5 degrees is
the amount of warming scientists and politicians have agreed would avoid
the most catastrophic consequences of climate change.) The Green, Lib
Dem and Labour councillors supported reducing emissions which they have
direct control of to zero by 2030 but Conservatives voted to amend this
to 2050 claiming that this was the approach which science dictates.
(scientific bases come from the IPCC and reported here)
These
Conservative showed a complete disregard for both science and the
political realities of climate change. Economically developed countries
like ours have been built on the back of decades of pollution which have
got us where we are both in economic terms and a climate crisis.
Therefore it is only right that developed countries cut their emissions
at a much greater pace than other countries who have historically
polluted less. Even more poignant is that scientists have said that the
2050 target gives us a 50:50 chance of avoiding the most catastrophic
effects of climate change. For KCC to target 2050 to cut emissions to
net zero is at best like flipping a coin for our future but seems to me
that they aren't genuine about doing their bit to tackle global warming.
Sunday, 19 May 2019
We need to transform local politics
KM 16.05.19 |
For a long time local elections have had very low turnouts, it is common
for there to be two or three times the number of non voters as
voters. These numbers only improve when county, national or EU elections
are held on the same day.
Our
First Past the Post voting system doesn't help because many people's
votes won't count. We should of course campaign for the introduction of a
better voting system but we still need to achieve things within FPTP
because life is too short!
My letter in the KM:
Political activists have spent the
last week theorising about what the recent local election results
proved but these amateur generalisations are often very biased. For
obvious reasons people from all political creeds like to point out where
their own did well but within this humdrum what is often missed is that
local politics is broken.
The
average turnout was just 32% for MBC and although this is similar to
many comparable elections it is appallingly low. While just two out of
eighteen parish councils had enough candidates to contest an election
which led to a former BNP & NF candidate becoming a parish
councillor by default while in the Borough council election he came in
8th place our of 8 candidates with just 43 of the 1631 votes cast.
Local
political parties and activists need to look at themselves and ask why
so few people vote. It would be easy and lazy to blame non voters but
rather than apathy I think many people despair at what they see.
What is needed is a complete transformation in our local politics.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)